τηλεορασηοποίση" του internet με συγκεκριμένα πακέτα πρόσβασης σε ιστοσελίδες και υπηρεσίες..

κάπως σαν τη "συνδρομητική τηλεόραση" για όσους έχουν να πληρώσουν

• 
  
• Printer-friendly version

Brussels, March 6th − La Quadrature du Net publishes a document, drafted by the British Government, with amendments to the telecoms package1. This proposal would turn the Internet into a Cable-TV network. First, there is a proposal to introduce conditions of access, alluding to the Conditional Access Directive2 regulating that very market. It is a subcription-TV-like concept reading through the lines. Second, there is language which overrides the end-to-end principle of the Internet. The idea behind it is that the Internet provider shall be allowed to limit the number of websites users can access, in exchange for a lower fee. Who wants telcos-controlled sub-Internet in Europe?

The national regulator will have the role of endorsing this new business model rather than protecting user's fundamental rights to information, culture and public services, as laid out in the UK amended article 8(4)(g):

NRAs shall promote the interests of the citizens of the European Union by for example “applying the principle that end-users should be able there should be transparency of conditions under which services are provided, including information on the conditions of to access to and/or use of and distribute information or run applications and services, and of any traffic management policies of their choice”

“In a context where markets like mobile telecommunication or entertainment industries, merging with telecommunication operators, are controlled by oligopolies, relying on the only information of the consumer leaves the consumer without any choice. Competition law would be the only remedy, and they proved to be totally inefficient against Microsoft or mobile operators cartels. Therefore, it is essential to define a positive guarantee of access to services without discrimination.” comments Jérémie Zimmermann, co-founder of La Quadrature du Net.

This preposterous proposal has already been included in the Council's compromise (pp 32-33)3 which will be discussed behind closed doors next week.

“The way these amendments are presented is deceptive: they are introduced as an information for consumer, while the point is to remove almost guarantee of access to Internet services. This is clearly a manoeuvre to break the balance of the text. MEPs must strongly reject it.”, concludes Zimmermann.

1. 1. http://www.laquadrature.net/files/UK_PROPOSED_AMENDMENTS_on_net_neutrality_DRAFT_20090223_print.pdf.
2. 2. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:31998L0084:EN:HTML.
3. 3. http://www.laquadrature.net/files/DS177_9_2009_02_27_print.pdf.

• 
  
• Printer-friendly version

On both parts of the Telecoms Package, rapported by Malcolm Harbour (IMCO report) and Catherine Trautmann (ITRE report), agreements have been found with the Council of the EU to destroy or neutralize major protections of the citizens against graduated response, "net discrimination" and filtering of content on the Internet. There is little time left, but the Parliament has a last chance with the plenary vote on May 6th to reaffirm its commitment to protecting EU citizens.

Both rapporteurs of the main directives of the Telecoms Package, Malcolm Harbour (IMCO report) and Catherine Trautmann (ITRE report) sacrificed the effective protection of citizens fundamental rights. They bent before the Council of the EU, under high pressure from France and UK, in shadowy trialogue negociations... Pressure was too high on them so they preferred finishing the Telecoms Package without risking to spend three more months negociating with the Council in a conciliation procedure1. These undemocratic practices lead to frightening compromise amendments that will be put to vote on the second reading plenary on Wednesday, May 6th in Strasbourg :

• In the IMCO report by M. Harbour, article 32(a) (former am. 166) protecting against arbitrary content filtering on the Internet, was totally neutralized. On the topic of "net discrimination", a safeguard that was already very weak (recital 26) was turned into a useless blurb. It's not a surprise that Harbour gave up to the pressure of the UK government and companies such as AT&T. But it's a shame for European citizens who deserve their right to communication, information and education, when used through the Internet, to be protected.
• In the ITRE report by C. Trautmann, amendment 138/46, adopted by 88% of the EP in first reading, and by 40 to 4 in committee last week, was abandoned. This article was crucial for protecting EU citizens against parallel arbitrary justice. Three-strike schemes against filesharers such as the HADOPI law proposal in France are not clearly forbidden by the new compromise. Even though these schemes remain contrary to the due process of law, one will wait years to have it confirmed in front of a court. In this clear attempt to please to N. Sarkozy, C. Trautmann agreed to a major step back in citizens' rights protection.

Citizens from all the EU must phone their MEPs to explain to them how crucial these stakes are for the future of our societies and our economies. MEPs have a chance to correct their colleagues' mistakes by voting for the "Citizen Rights amendments" package, which includes the original amendments 138, 130 (ITRE), and 166 (IMCO) from first reading, along with clear protections against "net discrimination", and removal of all remaining traces of "graduated response".

"A few weeks away from the elections, this is the only chance for the Members of European Parliament to correctly protect their electors' fundamental rights and freedoms over the Internet, against the will of greedy and obsolete industries." states Jérémie Zimmermann, co-founder and spokesperson of La Quadrature du Net.

1. 1. The conciliation is a kind of negociated "third reading" in the codecision procedure